Da. Sloan et al., THE USE OF THE OBJECTIVE STRUCTURED CLINICAL EXAMINATION (OSCE) FOR EVALUATION AND INSTRUCTION IN GRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION, The Journal of surgical research, 63(1), 1996, pp. 225-230
This study had two purposes: determining the reliability and validity
of the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in assessing p
erformance by trainees at all levels, including medical students and c
hief residents; and estimating the impact of providing OSCE participan
ts with immediate feedback about their performance. A comprehensive 21
0-min OSCE was administered to 53 surgical residents and 6 junior medi
cal students. Faculty experts proctored all patient stations and provi
ded immediate feedback to participants after the patient interaction s
egments (Part A). The participants then answered questions about the p
atients seen (Part B). The reliability of the OSCE was high (.91.), id
entical to that of a previous resident OSCE with no feedback. The stan
dard error of measurement for both parts was approximately 4%. At the
95% confidence interval, each participant's actual level of clinical p
erformance (Part A) and clinical knowledge (Part B) could be estimated
with an error of +/-8%. Participants showed significant differences i
n clinical performance (Part A, P < 0.01) and knowledge (Part B, P < 0
.01) by level of training. Most participants (74%) rated the OSCE as a
n above average or outstanding educational method. The OSCE is a valid
and reliable test of residents' clinical skills. Feedback to particip
ants during the OSCE was positively received and did not perturb test
reliability. (C) 1996 Academic Press, Inc.