This study compares a visual method for measuring composite wear with
a relatively inexpensive mechanical technique. The visual measurements
used a set of 17 graduated stone standards as the reference. Two sets
of 10 unknown casts were evaluated. The first was a set of 10 stone r
eplicas selected from the reference set in the range of 25-250 mu m. T
he second set was composed of 10 casts of clinical restorations. The m
echanical test employed a computer-controlled custom profilometer. Dep
th was recorded at 50 equidistant positions around the margin. A signi
ficant correlation was found (r > 0.98) between the visual and mechani
cal means for both measurement techniques. Mean values were equivalent
for the standard casts. However, visual estimation of the clinical ca
sts were significantly lower (61% of mechanical values) and thus not a
ccurate for clinical use.