The method of E-state structuralism provides dynamic models for the ev
olution and development of networks in small groups. Our interest lies
in the kind of social networks that these models produce. We ask the
question of whether such models produce ''interesting'' structure from
a network point-of-view, in particular, from the perspective of Holla
nd and Leinhardt who argue that any network that can be modeled adequa
tely using only properties of nodes and dyads has no social structure.
We show that E-state structuralism models are models of social struct
ure in this technical sense because they assume a bystander mechanism
in the creation of ties.