NICOTINAMIDE PHARMACOKINETICS IN HUMANS - EFFECT OF GASTRIC-ACID INHIBITION, COMPARISON OF RECTAL VS ORAL-ADMINISTRATION AND THE USE OF SALIVA FOR DRUG-MONITORING
Mrl. Stratford et al., NICOTINAMIDE PHARMACOKINETICS IN HUMANS - EFFECT OF GASTRIC-ACID INHIBITION, COMPARISON OF RECTAL VS ORAL-ADMINISTRATION AND THE USE OF SALIVA FOR DRUG-MONITORING, British Journal of Cancer, 74(1), 1996, pp. 16-21
The effect of inhibiting gastric acid secretion on nicotinamide pharma
cokinetics was studied in five volunteers with the intent of reducing
the large variations observed previously in the time to and magnitude
of peak plasma concentrations. Plasma levels were determined using a s
tandard high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method after an
oral dose of 3 g of nicotinamide either alone or preceded by pretreatm
ent with omeprazole. Suppression of gastric acid production had no sig
nificant effect on the rate of uptake or on the peak levels achieved.
To bypass gastric acidity, the rectal route was also assessed using a
suppository in four volunteers and one patient undergoing radiotherapy
. Absorption was slow and variable and much lower plasma levels were o
bserved than after oral dosing. Thus, no improvement in the pharmacoki
netics of nicotinamide was observed using either of these two approach
es. Parallel estimations were made using a novel and non-invasive meth
od for monitoring nicotinamide pharmacokinetics in saliva. A large and
variable fraction of the total amount of nicotinamide-related materia
l in saliva was found to be nicotinic acid, a metabolite not normally
found in human plasma. This conversion was inhibited by the use of a c
hlorhexidine mouthwash, indicating that the oral Bora was responsible
for its production. The time to peak levels of nicotinamide or of nico
tinamide plus nicotinic acid in saliva correlated well with that in pl
asma. However, peak concentrations for nicotinamide alone were signifi
cantly lower than in plasma, and very variable, whereas for nicotinami
de plus nicotinic acid saliva levels were 20-30% higher, but more cons
istent. Although there ale some practical difficulties in quantitative
ly handling saliva, the method is very useful for monitoring nicotinam
ide pharmacokinetics and for assessment of compliance with nicotinamid
e treatment.