When the Faculty of Pharmacy at the University of Toronto decided to c
onsider nontraditional criteria for the purpose of making admissions d
ecisions, it was clear that a credible assessment framework would be n
eeded for the task. The pivotal, related problems were: (I) that we wi
shed to assess affective characteristics of applicants without the use
of the traditional interview process that is used by many schools of
pharmacy; and, (ii) that the assessment of affective characteristics f
or selection purposes often is unreliable in that answers are easily '
'faked.'' This paper describes the developmental process that was used
, the criteria that were ultimately chosen and the outcomes of our fir
st round of admissions using our new instrument. Ultimately, we found
that a combination of the overall GPA, PCAT verbal and reading subscor
es, the score on a problem-solving essay, and a structured self-assess
ment item best predicted academic success in the first year of our new
problem-based and practice-oriented curriculum.