LACK OF DESENSITIZATION TO AEROSOL PENTAMIDINE WITH LONG-TERM USE

Citation
A. Rawji et al., LACK OF DESENSITIZATION TO AEROSOL PENTAMIDINE WITH LONG-TERM USE, Journal of aerosol medicine, 9(2), 1996, pp. 241-248
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Journal title
ISSN journal
08942684
Volume
9
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
241 - 248
Database
ISI
SICI code
0894-2684(1996)9:2<241:LODTAP>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether long-term exposure to aerosol pentamidine (AP) results in desensitization. Study Design: Phase I-A retrospectiv e, two group comparative study. Phase II-A prospective intervention st udy. Methods: Patients were selected from a 5-year database of 1200 in dividuals infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) Who rec eived AP as prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), In p hase I, serial pre- and post-AP spirometry data of 33 subjects with si gnificant bronchospasm on initial exposure to AP, who thus received ae rosol salbutamol (AS) as regular pre-AP premedication for over 18 mont hs, were compared to 33 matched controls who did not use AS. In phase II, 13 of the original group of 33 patients who required regular AS co nsented to a follow-up AP treatment without AS premedication to examin e the effects of discontinuing AS premedication. Results: Phase I: on their initial AP treatment without AS premedication, the drop in mean FVC, FEV(1), and FEV(1)/FVC values post-AP therapy was significantly l ower for the AS group compared to the control group. The mean FEV(1)/F VC value for the AS group was 84% pre-AP and dropped to 75% post-AP th erapy. For the control group, the corresponding FEV(1)/FVC values were 83% (pre-AP) and 79% (post-AP). After using AS as premedication for A P for 18 months, the AS group did not show any reduction in flow rates as the mean FEV(1)/FVC values were 77% (pre-AP) and 80% (post-AP). Th e values in the control group were 80 and 78%, respectively. In phase LI, when the 13 subjects who needed regular AS premedication were expo sed to AP without premedication with AS, the flow rates are reduced in the same magnitude as observed at initial exposure to AP. Conclusions : The results of this study show that the prevention of bronchospasm. with AS premedication while receiving long-term AP administration is d ue to the bronchodilator effect of AS, as desensitization is not achie ved after over 18 months of exposure, These findings support long-term regular premedication with AS in patients with documented AP-induced bronchospasm.