Invoking its social function can explain why we find a certain functio
nal trait or institution only if we can identify a mechanism whereby t
he playing of the function connects with the explanandum. That is the
main claim in the missing-mechanism critique of functionalism. Is it c
orrect? Yes, if functional explanation is meant to make sense of the a
ctual presence of the trait or institution. No, if it is meant to make
sense of why the trait or institution is resilient: why we can rely o
n it to survive various contingencies. The lesson? Social functionalis
m should be taken, and may have been taken by its founders, as a progr
amme for explaining resilience.