E. Klumper et al., IN-VITRO RESISTANCE TO CYTOSINE-ARABINOSIDE, NOT TO DAUNORUBICIN, IS ASSOCIATED WITH THE RISK OF RELAPSE IN DE-NOVO ACUTE MYELOID-LEUKEMIA, British Journal of Haematology, 93(4), 1996, pp. 903-910
The efficacy of chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is limit
ed by clinical drug resistance. We determined in vitro resistance to c
ytosine arabinoside (ARAC), daunorubicin (DNR), mitoxantrone (MITOX),
m-amsacrine (AMSA) and etoposide (VP16) in 49 adults with de novo AML
using the MTT assay. Results showed that nonresponders to chemotherapy
were, in vitro, 2 . 9-fold more resistant to DNR, but not more resist
ant to ARA-C, compared to complete responders. However, complete respo
nders who were in vitro resistant to ARA-C had a 4-fold higher risk of
relapse (95% CI 1 . 3-12 . 5-fold) compared to complete responders in
vitro sensitive to ARA-C. With a mean follow-up of 12 months the prob
ability of continuous complete remission (CCR) for patients in vitro s
ensitive to ARA-C was 61% at 34 months (95% CI 28-82%), whereas all pa
tients in vitro resistant to ARA-C relapsed within 18 months from diag
nosis. This difference appeared to be independent of other clinical fe
atures such as sex, age, white blood cell count, FAB classification, a
nd CD34 expression. In vitro resistance to DNR was not related to the
probability of CCR. We conclude that in vitro drug resistance assessed
with the MTT assay appears to be associated with short- and long-term
clinical outcome in AML. Confirmatory studies comprising a sufficient
number of patients for multivariate analyses should prove whether in
vitro resistance to ARA-C will appear to be an independent risk factor
.