Ecosystem management means different things to different people, but t
he underlying concept is similar to that of the long-standing ethic of
conservation. Current interest in marine ecosystem management stems f
rom concerns about overexploitation of world fisheries and the perceiv
ed need for broader perspectives in fisheries management. A central sc
ientific question is whether the effects of harvesting (top down) or c
hanges in the physical environment (bottom up) are responsible for maj
or changes in abundance. Historically, ecology, fisheries biology, oce
anography, fisheries management and the fishing industry have gone som
ewhat separate ways. Since the 1980s, increasing attention has been gi
ven to multispecies aspects of fisheries, the linkages between oceanog
raphy and fish abundance and more holistic approaches to fisheries man
agement. Sorting out the causes and effects of fluctuations in fish ab
undance is complicated by the lack of reliability of fisheries statist
ics. Discards, dishonesty and the inherent logistic difficulties of co
llecting statistics all combine to confuse interpretation. The overcap
acity of fishing fleets and their unrestricted use are widely recogniz
ed as a contributing cause to overfishing and declines in fish stocks
in many parts of the world. Ecosystem management, as shorthand for mor
e holistic approaches to resource management, is, from a fisheries man
agement perspective, centred on multispecies interactions in the conte
xt of a variable physical and chemical environment. Broader perspectiv
es include social, economic and political elements which are best cons
idered pragmatically as a part of the context of fisheries management.
Objectives in marine ecosystem management are varied. From a biologic
al perspective, an underlying principle of management is commonly assu
med to be a sustained yield of products for human consumption. Whether
that should be taken to mean that the yield should always be of the s
ame products is less certain. Fishing commonly changes the relative ab
undance of species of fishes. Thus, a biological objective should spec
ify the species mix that is desired. Concern for the maintenance of gl
obal diversity has generated a substantial literature on threatened an
d endangered species. In general, it has not been considered likely th
at marine fish species could be rendered extinct and greatest attentio
n has been given to marine mammals, sea birds and sea turtles. The pro
vision of marine parks and sanctuary areas are obvious first steps in
providing a measure of protection, at least for the less widely rangin
g species. Related to the current concepts of ecosystem management are
expressions such as ecosystem health and ecosystem integrity which ar
e given a wide range of different meanings, none of which are readily
translated into operational language for resource management. These an
d similar expressions are best assessed as rhetorical devices. The ess
ential components of ecosystem management are sustainable yield, maint
enance of biodiversity and protection from the effects of pollution an
d habitat degradation. Theory for marine ecosystem management has a lo
ng history in fisheries and ecological literature. Ecological models s
uch as Lotka-Volterra equations, ECOPATH, trophic cascades and chaos t
heory do not give practical guidance for management. Fleet interaction
and multispecies virtual population analysis models hold more promise
for fisheries managers. Alaska provides particular opportunities for
developing new concepts in fisheries management. Statistics of catch a
re good, stock assessments are at the state-of-the-art level and manag
ement has been prudent. Debate is active on the causes of substantial
changes in abundance of many species including marine mammals, because
substantial changes in the fisheries have been accompanied by major c
hanges in oceanographic conditions. As elsewhere, the resultant change
s may be a consequence of top-down and bottom-up effects. The bottom p
art is beyond human control, and ecosystem management is centred on ma
naging the top-down or fisheries component in the context of special m
easures of protection for particular species. Whether that is a realis
tic goal depends in part on how much special protection is to be affor
ded to which species. Marine mammals, for example, are given high prio
rity for special protection, but like fisheries they too may have sign
ificant roles in shaping the structure of marine ecosystems. Eventuall
y, ecosystem management must come to grips with the question of how mu
ch protection of particular species is desirable in achieving optimal
use of living marine resources.