B. Hylander et Cm. Kjellstrand, PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND TREATMENT OF SEVERE ETHYLENE-GLYCOL INTOXICATION, Intensive care medicine, 22(6), 1996, pp. 546-552
Objective: Analysis of prognostic factors and treatment of a large epi
demic of ethylene glycol intoxication. Design: Retrospective case revi
ew comparing 16 survivors with 6 patients who died. Setting: Cooperati
ve study between county hospitals, a university hospital, and a poison
information centre. Patients and participants: Survival review of 36
serious cases and chart review of 17 cases. Intervention: Time to init
ial treatment with intravenous fluids, sodium, bicarbonate, ethanol, a
nd dialysis. Measurements: Clinical data at admission and blood chemis
try at 0, 24, 48, and 72 h. Results: 6 of 36 patients (17%) died; 11 o
f 17 patients whose charts were reviewed survived and 3 had chronic re
nal failure. All but 2 patients had acute renal failure. Neither delay
to admission, intravenous dialysis, HCO3 or alcohol was related to ou
tcome. At admission more patients who subsequently died had seizures,
were comatose, were more acidotic, and had lower base excess and highe
r potassium levels than those who survived. Urine contained oxalate cr
ystals in 10 of 14 cases. At 24 h the potassium level was higher and t
he base excess lower in those who died. Blood ethylene glycol levels f
or the patients who died and survived were no different. All survivors
were dialyzed, but 2 patients who died had no dialysis. No survivor n
eeded chronic dialysis and none had organic brain lesions. Conclusion:
In patients with severe ethylene glycol intoxication, severe acidosis
, hyperkalemia, seizures, and coma at admission carry a dismal prognos
is. We believe very large amounts of intravenous HCO3 should be used i
mmediately for rapid correction of the metabolic acidosis. Intravenous
ethanol and hemodialysis should be started early and continued until
acidosis is corrected.