Gastric, colon and rectal cancers are different clinical entities but
similarities do exist concerning the patterns of treatment failure. Th
e surgeon must accept that cure is unlikely for patients with tumors a
ggressively spreading along lymphatic, hematogenous and transperitonea
l routes. Surgery cannot control occult metastases at key-disseminatin
g sites outside the margins of resection. With a balanced risk-benefit
ratio in mind the goal of surgery for primary cancer should be contai
nment of the malignancy during its complete resection. Tumor biology i
s important in assessing prognosis. However, the hypothesis presented
in this manuscript suggests that technical factors practiced by the su
rgeon constitute an important prognostic variable. These technical fac
tors as a group compete with tumor biology as the most important deter
minator of prognosis. To optimize the resection of a gastric, colon or
rectal cancer some or all of the following strategies should be pursu
ed to minimize the risk of local and intraabdominal dissemination: 1.
Preservation of mesodermal planes; 2. Extended lymphadenectomy to incr
ease the rate of complete resection of lymph node metastases thus decr
easing local recurrence rate (Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy remain
s to be determined but overly aggressive high mortality resections are
to be avoided); 3. Other technical maneuvers to minimize spillage of
malignant cells include electrosurgery for both dissection and hemosta
sis, preliminary ligation of the major arteries, en bloc resection of
involved adjacent structures, and wide exposure using self retaining r
etractors. The level of skill with which the surgeon combines all thes
e surgical maneuvers will profoundly affect survival. Nevertheless, su
rgical technique alone may not be able to eliminate cancer cell spill
all together, eliminate the free intraperitoneal cancer cells shed fro
m the tumor prior to resection, as well as control occult liver metast
asis. Maximally curative surgical effort may require surgically direct
ed perioperative chemotherapy (see Part 2) as part of the treatment of
resectable disease. Continued studies of the patterns of surgical tre
atment failure after presumably curative resection will help to develo
p the criteria for selection of patients who will require further ''ad
juvant'' treatment.