Understanding and predicting ecosystem functioning (e.g., carbon and w
ater fluxes) and the role of soils in carbon storage requires an accur
ate assessment of plant rooting distributions. Here, in a comprehensiv
e literature synthesis, we analyze rooting patterns for terrestrial bi
omes and compare distributions for various plant functional groups. We
compiled a database of 250 root studies, subdividing suitable results
into 11 biomes, and fitted the depth coefficient beta to the data for
each biome (Gale and Grigal 1987). beta is a simple numerical index o
f rooting distribution based on the asymptotic equation Y = 1-beta(d),
where d = depth and Y = the proportion of roots from the surface to d
epth d. High values of beta correspond to a greater proportion of root
s with depth. Tundra, boreal fori:st, and temperate grasslands showed
the shallowest rooting profiles (beta = 0.913, 0.943, and 0.943, respe
ctively), with 80-90% of roots in the top 30 cm of soil; deserts and t
emperate coniferous forests showed the deepest profiles (beta = 0.975
and 0.976, respectively) and had only 50% of their roots in the upper
30 cm. Standing root biomass varied by over an order of magnitude acro
ss biomes, from approximately 0.2 to 5 kg m(-2). Tropical evergreen fo
rests had the highest root biomass (5 kg m(-2)), but other forest biom
es and sclerophyllous shrublands were of similar magnitude. Root bioma
ss for croplands, deserts, tundra and grasslands was below 1.5 kg m(-2
) Root/shout (R/S) ratios highest for tundra, grasslands, and cold des
erts (ranging from 4 to 7); forest ecosystems and croplands had the lo
west R/S ratios (approximately 0.1 to 0.5). Comparing data across biom
es for plant functional groups, grasses had 44% of their roots in the
top 10 cm of soil (beta = 0.952), while shrubs had only 21% in the sam
e depth increment (beta = 0.978). The rooting distribution of all temp
erate and tropical trees was beta = 0.970 with 26% of roots in the top
10 cm and 60% in the top 30 cm. Overall, the globally averaged root d
istribution for all ecosystems was beta = 0.966 (r(2) = 0.89) with app
roximately 30%, 50%, and 75% of roots in the top 10 cm, 20 cm, and 40
cm, respectively. We discuss the merits and possible shortcomings of o
ur analysis in the context of root biomass and root functioning.