This article reviews the evidence for acclimatization and deprivation
with respect to non-speech auditory abilities. Although this subject h
as not been studied extensively, clear evidence exists for acclimatiza
tion and/or deprivation effects on intensity discrimination, binaural
masking level difference, and auditory localization and lateralization
. There is also some argument for such effects with regard to changes
in tolerance for intense sounds or preferred levels of amplification.
However, the main evidence for these effects, changes in loudness disc
omfort levels with repeated testing, may reasonably be explained as pr
ocedural or task-related effects rather than changes in auditory abili
ties. On the other hand, the successful use of tinnitus maskers to tre
at hyperacusis suggests that particularly low tolerance levels may be
improved by exposure to certain types of auditory stimulation. Overall
, this retrospective review of changes in nonspeech auditory abilities
, associated with the presence or absence of listening experience, ind
icates that acclimatization or deprivation effects may have influenced
the results of some of the experiments reviewed. This suggests that e
xperiments designed to study acclimatization or deprivation are timely
and useful. In addition, acclimatization and deprivation are potentia
l variables that should be considered, and preferably controlled, with
in experiments on auditory abilities. Clinically, the review adds weig
ht to the argument for considering acclimatization and/or deprivation
in hearing aid fitting and evaluation.