DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS OF CODA-Q USING SIMILAR MICROEARTHQUAKES IN SEISMIC GAPS .2. APPLICATION TO SEISMOGRAMS RECORDED BY THE PARKFIELD HIGH-RESOLUTION SEISMIC NETWORK
M. Antolik et al., DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS OF CODA-Q USING SIMILAR MICROEARTHQUAKES IN SEISMIC GAPS .2. APPLICATION TO SEISMOGRAMS RECORDED BY THE PARKFIELD HIGH-RESOLUTION SEISMIC NETWORK, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(3), 1996, pp. 890-910
Nearly two-thirds of the microseismicity occurring at Parkfield, Calif
ornia, consists of repeating clusters of closely located events exhibi
ting waveform cross-correlation values exceeding 0.95. This observatio
n, coupled with a high probability for an M approximate to earthquake
within the next decade (Working Group on California Earthquake Probabi
lities, 1988), make this segment of the San Andreas fault system a pri
me location to search for temporal variations in coda Q associated wit
h crustal changes that may occur during the earthquake cycle. The coda
comparison analysis method described in Part 1 of this study (Aster e
t al., 1996) is applied to data from four borehole stations of the Par
kfield High Resolution Seismic Network (HRSN) for the period January 1
987 through February 1994. We examine 21 of the nearly 300 repeating c
lusters observed to date. The restriction of the data set to only the
most highly similar sources is observed to be critical; small differen
ces in the source process, even for event pairs with centroid location
s within approximately 20 m, significantly increase the spurious noise
level in the parameter estimates. Absolute 68% confidence bound estim
ates obtained on the repeatability of coda Q for all microearthquake p
airs are +/- 10% for frequencies below 20 Hz. Tighter constraints are
obtainable by reconstructing the temporal history of coda Q from the f
irst difference measurements between microearthquake pairs. These func
tional reconstructions show that the mean value of coda Q has not vari
ed by more than approximately 5% from 3 to 30 Hz at the 1 sigma level
during the study period. However, other observables, such as an increa
sed level of microseismicity, suggest that a preparatory stage for the
next Parkfield earthquake has begun, indicating that coda Q is so far
showing no sign of sensitivity to preparatory processes at Parkfield.