TO FORGET OR NOT TO FORGET - THE EFFECT OF PROBABILITY OF TEST ON DIRECTED FORGETTING

Citation
Jm. Golding et al., TO FORGET OR NOT TO FORGET - THE EFFECT OF PROBABILITY OF TEST ON DIRECTED FORGETTING, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 49(2), 1996, pp. 326-340
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology, Experimental",Psychology
ISSN journal
02724987
Volume
49
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
326 - 340
Database
ISI
SICI code
0272-4987(1996)49:2<326:TFONTF>2.0.ZU;2-U
Abstract
Two experiments investigated how individuals use explicit memory cues that designate different probabilities of test. As in typical directed forgetting studies, subjects received words explicitly cued as having either a 0% or a 100% chance of being on a subsequent memory test (i. e. forget and remember cues, respectively). In addition, some words we re explicitly cued as having the potential to be either forgotten or r emembered (i.e. a 50% cue). Recall of 50% words was between that of 0% and 100% words. In addition, the presence of 50% words lowered recall of the 100% words compared to that of a control group that did not re ceive the 50% words, but received the same number of 100% words. A thi nk-aloud task indicated that these results were due to the 50% words b eing treated like either 100% or 0% words at encoding. The results are discussed in terms of the effect of different probabilities of test o n the strategic processing and representation of information.