Jm. Golding et al., TO FORGET OR NOT TO FORGET - THE EFFECT OF PROBABILITY OF TEST ON DIRECTED FORGETTING, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology, 49(2), 1996, pp. 326-340
Two experiments investigated how individuals use explicit memory cues
that designate different probabilities of test. As in typical directed
forgetting studies, subjects received words explicitly cued as having
either a 0% or a 100% chance of being on a subsequent memory test (i.
e. forget and remember cues, respectively). In addition, some words we
re explicitly cued as having the potential to be either forgotten or r
emembered (i.e. a 50% cue). Recall of 50% words was between that of 0%
and 100% words. In addition, the presence of 50% words lowered recall
of the 100% words compared to that of a control group that did not re
ceive the 50% words, but received the same number of 100% words. A thi
nk-aloud task indicated that these results were due to the 50% words b
eing treated like either 100% or 0% words at encoding. The results are
discussed in terms of the effect of different probabilities of test o
n the strategic processing and representation of information.