R. Mcglincheyberroth et al., SEMANTIC PROCESSING AND ORTHOGRAPHIC SPECIFICITY IN HEMISPATIAL NEGLECT, Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 8(3), 1996, pp. 291-304
Two sets of experiments, each consisting of a semantic priming task an
d a discrimination task, investigated the proceedings of lexical infor
mation in the neglected visual field. In the semantic priming task, su
bjects made lexical decisions to target words preceded by lateralized
word primes; in the discrimination task, they indicated which of two w
ords corresponded to a target word presented to the left visual field
(LVF) or right visual field (RVF). The first set of experiments indica
ted that although patients were unable to discriminate words presented
in the LVF,they showed significant priming when LVF primes were follo
wed by semantically related targets compared to unrelated targets. The
second set of experiments further examined the nature of this priming
effect by comparing priming in a condition in which primes were seman
tically related to the target word (e.g., TEA-CUP) and a condition in
which primes were unrelated to the target word, but orthographically s
imilar to a related prime (e.g., PEA-CUP). This experiment replicated
the previously established semantic priming effects and demonstrated s
ignificant negative priming for targets preceded by LVF primes that we
re orthographically similar to a semantically related word. Again, pat
ients performed at chance in the forced-choice discrimination task whe
n targets were presented in the LVE These findings indicate that seman
tic processing of neglected lexical information is based on hilly spec
ified perceptual and orthographic information. A lateral inhibitory me
chanism is proposed that maximizes the probability, albeit unsuccessfu
lly, that neglected orthographic information will reach awareness.