K. Parczyk et Mr. Schneider, THE FUTURE OF ANTIHORMONE THERAPY - INNOVATIONS BASED ON AN ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLE, Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 122(7), 1996, pp. 383-396
Endocrine therapy of mammary and prostate cancer has been established
for decades. The therapies available to block sex-hormone-receptor-med
iated tumor growth are based on two principles: (i) ligand depletion,
which can be achieved surgically, by use of luteinizing-hormone-releas
ing hormone analogues or inhibitors of enzymes involved in steroid bio
synthesis or by interfering with the feedback mechanisms of sex hormon
e synthesis at the pituitary/hypothalamic level; (ii) blockade of sex
hormone receptor function by use of antihormones. The antiestrogen tam
oxifen, which is the compound of choice for the treatment of mammary c
arcinoma, has the drawback of being a partial agonist. A complete bloc
kade of estrogen receptor (ER) function can be achieved by a new class
of compounds, pure antiestrogens. In contrast to aromatase inhibitors
, pure antiestrogens are able to block ER activation by ligands other
than estradiol and can also interfere with ligand-independent ER activ
ation. In addition to estradiol, progesterone has a strong proliferati
ve effect in mammary carcinomas. Antiprogestins are promising new tool
s for clinical breast cancer therapy. These compounds clearly need a f
unctionally expressed progesterone receptor to block tumor growth, but
there is strong experimental evidence that their tumor inhibition is
based on more than just progesterone antagonism. The ability of these
compounds to induce tumor cell differentiation that leads to apoptosis
is unique among all other endocrine therapeutics. In prostate tumors
that have relapsed from current androgen-ablation therapies the androg
en receptor (AR) is still expressed and, compared to the primary tumor
s, its level is often even enhanced. Mutated AR that can be activated
by other compounds such as adrenal steroids, estrogens, progestins and
even antiandrogens have been detected in recurrent tumors. Thus, rela
pse of tumors under the selective pressure of common androgen-ablation
therapies can be caused by acquired androgen hypersensitivity and AR
activation by ligands other than (dihydro-)testosterone. There is a cl
inical need for future compounds that produce a complete blockade of A
R activity even in recurrent tumors. Preclinical experiments indicate
that combination therapy as well as the extension of endocrine treatme
nts to several other tumor entities are promising approaches for furth
er developments. Examples are the combination of antiestrogens and ant
iprogestins for breast cancer treatment, or the treatment of prostate
carcinomas with antiprogestins.