According to popular opinion, thought experiments are limited in scope
, since no novel empirical results could be expected to be produced by
thought alone. Yet consider the spectacular 16th century experiment b
y Stevin, leading to the discovery of the principles of the resolution
and combination of forces. He conducted no experiments, for he derive
d his novel and highly important conclusions by several steps of ingen
ious reasoning alone. To understand why mental experiments may serve a
s very effective scientific tools, we need to explicate carefully thei
r underlying mechanism. Thought experiments invariably involve the wid
ely debated notion of ''counterfactual conditionals.'' A variety of hi
storical examples are offered designed to illustrate the nature of tho
ught experiments, their associated counterfactual conditionals, as wel
l a the nature of the vital link between the two.