Willingness to pay (WTP), most economists believe, is an appropriate b
enefits metric for government expenditure and regulatory policies that
reduce risks to human life. It depends, however, on the distribution
of risk and wealth. Currently, society's expenditures overemphasize co
ncentrated risks, say after-the-fact treatment as opposed to preventio
n. A ''dead-anyway'' effect complements excess attention to intense in
terests in explaining this. Our normative criterion for spending on ri
sk reduction is what a rational, albeit uninsured, individual confront
ing lotteries on future risks to life and wealth would choose for hims
elf. This requires correcting WTP to eliminate the dead-anyway effect
but continues to reflect that wealth enhances the utility of living.