THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE HOW TO DIE - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF STATE LAWS PROHIBITING PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED

Authors
Citation
Dl. Sloss, THE RIGHT TO CHOOSE HOW TO DIE - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF STATE LAWS PROHIBITING PHYSICIAN-ASSISTED, Stanford law review, 48(4), 1996, pp. 937-973
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
Law
Journal title
ISSN journal
00389765
Volume
48
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
937 - 973
Database
ISI
SICI code
0038-9765(1996)48:4<937:TRTCHT>2.0.ZU;2-5
Abstract
Physician-assisted suicide (PAE) is an emotionally charged issue that state legislators struggle with more and more each year. In this note, David Sloss examines whether the right to voluntary PAF is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Mr. Sloss argue s that all competent, terminally ill patients have a fundamental right to die with dignity. He concludes that no state should place a substa ntial obstacle, or undue burden, in the path of a competent patient wi th an objectively rational desire to die.