The European traffic sign system encodes the meaning of a sign by use
of varying forms, colours and symbols. However, signs differ greatly i
n how explicit their message is. Thus, the meaning of most direction s
igns is self-evident, while that of some others is less obvious. The E
uropean built-up area sign limits driving speed to 50 km/h, like speed
limit signs, but its rectangular form and symbol not associated with
speed limit distinguish it clearly from standard speed limit signs. Al
so, the function of the built-up area sign is more complex than the on
e of speed limit signs: the built-up area sign both limits speed and i
nforms about entering a built-up area. The purpose of this study was t
o investigate whether the built-up area sign is noticed and obeyed as
well as speed limit signs. In three held experiments the 50 km/h, 80 k
m/h signs and built-up area signs were alternated and speed changes we
re measured. Results indicated that the built-up area signs elicit onl
y negligible speed responses compared to the speed limit signs while s
upervision (visible police car) results in a similar effect for both s
igns. The same results were also obtained in the laboratory where slid
es about traffic situations were shown to subjects who were asked if i
t was necessary to decelerate. These findings suggested that, in contr
ast to the built-up area sign, drivers have developed a mental model w
hich facilitates more effective noticing of speed limit signs. The bui
lt-up sign does not share these facilitating effects, because of its d
ual function and symbol and form which are not associated with speed l
imits.