Privatization is proceeding slowly in many Eastern European countries.
This is largely because the insiders, who currently have control but
not property rights to the firms, oppose outsider privatization. Priva
tization would proceed faster if governments decided to go the insider
privatization route. There would seem to be two strong efficiency arg
uments for doing so. First, insider privatization aligns control and p
roperty rights. This gives the right incentives to insiders. Second, i
f for some reason, insiders cannot do the job themselves, they will ha
ve the right incentives to sell the firms to those outsiders who can.
Our paper focuses on this second argument. We conclude that it is not
as obvious as it seems. There is a wedge between the value of the firm
to insiders and the value of the firm to outsiders. Depending on the
details of insider privatization, and on the details of the resale pro
cess, this wedge may prevent resale, and thus prevent desirable restru
cturing.