CYCLIN D1 AMPLIFICATION IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER BUT MAY PREDICT EARLY RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WITH FEATURES OF GOOD PROGNOSIS
R. Seshadri et al., CYCLIN D1 AMPLIFICATION IS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH REDUCED OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PRIMARY BREAST-CANCER BUT MAY PREDICT EARLY RELAPSE IN PATIENTS WITH FEATURES OF GOOD PROGNOSIS, Clinical cancer research, 2(7), 1996, pp. 1177-1184
Amplification of chromosome 11q13 is frequently observed in human mali
gnancies, including breast cancers, A candidate oncogene at this locus
is the CCND1 gene, which encodes the fell cycle regulatory protein cy
clin D1. Because published data on the relationship between 11q13 ampl
ification and prognosis in breast cancer have been controversial, we i
nvestigated the clinical significance of CCND1 amplification and its a
ssociation with established clinicopathological features of prognosis
in 1014 primary breast cancer patients, Amplification of the CCND1 gen
e and the INT-2/FGF-3 gene, which also maps to 11q13, was 10% and 17%,
respectively, There were no associations between CCND1 or INT-2 ampli
fication and patient age, tumor size, tumor grade, axillary lymph node
status, HER/neu amplification, MIB-1 monoclonal antibody to Ki67 anti
gen count, or p53 expression, CCND1 amplification was predominantly ob
served in hormone receptor-positive tumors; at a copy number greater t
han or equal to 3, CCND1 amplification was significantly correlated wi
th both estrogen receptor (ER; P = 0.036) and progesterone receptor (P
= 0.012) positivity, After a median follow-up period of 66 months, CC
ND1 or INT-2 amplification was not associated with significant increas
es in relapse or death from breast cancer, However, in the node-negati
ve and ER-positive subgroups, there was a trend for an increased relap
se rate in patients with INT-2 or CCND1 amplification, Thus, in this s
tudy, assessment of CCND1 or INT-2 amplification at 11q13 by slot-blot
hybridization was of little use in determining phenotype or disease o
utcome in the whole group of patients but had a potential role in iden
tifying a subset of poor-prognosis patients within the node-negative o
r ER-positive, good-prognosis groups, Because the prevalence of CCND1
amplification is much lower than the reported prevalence of cyclin D1
overexpression, additional studies are required to determine the true
prognostic significance of altered cyclin D1 expression in breast canc
er.