Gs. Harman et al., A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARISON OF SINGLE-DOSE AND DIVIDED MULTIPLE-DOSE DOLASETRON FOR CISPLATIN-INDUCED EMESIS, Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 38(4), 1996, pp. 323-328
Purpose: Intravenous dolasetron has been shown to be an effective anti
emetic agent in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin-containing chem
otherapy. Previous studies have suggested that 1.8 mg/kg is an optimal
dose for achieving control of emesis and nausea. The objective of thi
s study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a single intravenous
(IV) dose of dolasetron with an equal divided multiple dose. Methods:
In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study,
the efficacy and safety of a single 1.8-mg/kg dose of dolasetron given
30 min prior to high-dose cisplatin (greater than or equal to 80 mg/m
(2)) chemotherapy was compared with the same total amount of dolasetro
n administered in three separate doses (0.6 mg/kg each) over a 12-h in
terval commencing 30 min prior to beginning chemotherapy and ending 11
.5 h later. Antiemetic efficacy, safety, and tolerability were compare
d in 55 patients with various malignancies during the 24 h following t
he initiation of chemotherapy. The number of emetic episodes was the p
rimary efficacy parameter. Results: A single IV dose of dolasetron was
generally more effective than a multiple-dose regimen in all measures
of efficacy. There was a larger proportion of complete responders in
the single-dose group compared with the multiple-dose group (48% vs 23
%), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. C
ompared with the multiple-dose group, patients who received a single d
ose of dolasetron had a significantly (P = 0.034) longer median time t
o the first emetic episode (10.1 h vs > 24 h, respectively). Overall,
53% of patients had either a complete response or a major response to
dolasetron, and only 40% of the total patient population received esca
pe antiemetic medication in the 24 h after cisplatin administration. E
xcept for headache, adverse events were similar with both regimens and
were generally of mild or moderate intensity; no serious adverse even
ts occurred. Neither dolasetron treatment regimen was associated with
any clinically important events, trends in laboratory variables, or di
fferences in safety profile. Conclusions: single-dose dolasetron was w
ell tolerated and effectively controlled emesis and nausea in patients
who received highly emetogenic, high-dose cisplatin chemotherapy. The
greater antiemetic efficacy of a single prophylactic dose of dolasetr
on offers both convenience and potential cost savings, compared with a
multiple-dose schedule of administration.