Cr. Cox et al., A COMPARISON OF EPIDURAL INFUSIONS OF FENTANYL OR PETHIDINE WITH BUPIVACAINE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE PAIN, Anaesthesia, 51(7), 1996, pp. 695-698
A double-blind randomised clinical trial was undertaken in 40 patients
undergoing major abdominal surgery. Postoperative pain relief was pro
vided using epidural infusions of 0.06% bupivacaine with fentanyl 4 mu
g.ml(-1) (n = 20) (group F) or with pethidine 1.5 mg.ml(-1) (n = 20)
(group P). Postoperative pain scores using a visual analogue scale (0-
100 mm) were not significantly different between the two groups. Media
n pain scores were 0-19 mm at all times of assessment indicating that
good analgesia was provided by both regimens. There was no significant
difference between the epidural infusion rates in the two groups. The
side effects and effect on pulmonary function were similar in each gr
oup. Nine patients were withdrawn from the study (four from group F, f
ive from group P) due to failure of the epidural technique or other co
mplications. Fourteen patients, equally distributed, required a total
of 24 epidural 'top-ups' by an anaesthetist because of inadequate anal
gesia. We demonstrated no advantage with epidural pethidine over fenta
nyl when used by infusion in combination with bupivacaine in the manag
ement of postoperative pain.