Anecdotal evidence and correlational studies provide consistent eviden
ce that the skill and integrity of legislative incumbents strongly aff
ect those representatives' prospects for reelection. What is less clea
r, however, is why these effects occur. In particular, previous resear
ch fails to establish that voters incorporate objective information pe
rtaining to candidate quality in the decision calculus. We address thi
s issue through use of a laboratory experiment in which objective desc
riptions of the skill and integrity of US. House candidates were varie
d. Results reveal that both feeling thermometer scores and the vote ch
oice were influenced by the information concerning candidate quality.
The effects of skill and integrity were not attenuated by our particip
ants' partisan attachments or political knowledge, nor by variance in
the information format or the candidates' issue positions. Collectivel
y, these results suggest that candidate quality may exert broad influe
nce on the vote choice, and that this influence operates independently
from other conventional predictors of the vote. Copyright (C) 1996 El
sevier Science Ltd.