E. Panieri et al., IATROGENIC ESOPHAGEAL-PERFORATION IN CHILDREN - PATTERNS OF INJURY, PRESENTATION, MANAGEMENT, AND OUTCOME, Journal of pediatric surgery, 31(7), 1996, pp. 890-895
latrogenic esophageal perforations in children are rare. To evaluate p
atterns of injury, clinical presentation, and treatment options for su
ch patients, the authors reviewed the case records of 11 children who
had sustained transmural injury to the esophagus during a dilatation p
rocedure at their institution between 1967 and 1994. Strictures requir
ing dilatation were attributable to caustic ingestion in eight, esopha
geal atresia repair in two, and congenital stenosis in one. Eight were
penetrating injuries, and three were disruptions. Two involved the ce
rvical esophagus; and nine involved the thoracic esophagus. Pain, pyre
xia, and tachycardia were early signs. Proximal thoracic perforations
led to signs in the left chest region (effusion/pneumothorax); with di
stal perforation the signs were on the right side. Treatment along con
ventional lines (local drainage, gastrostomy, primary repair after ear
ly recognition, and antibiotic therapy) was successful, with two major
complications, both empyemas. The most recent case, a disruption of a
tracheoesophageal fistula stricture, was successfully treated with or
al water irrigation and antibiotics only. Six had colonic interpositio
n (all caustic ingestion), one required endoesophageal resection of a
distal stricture, and four had resolution of the stricture, three with
out additional dilatation. The majority of children with iatrogenic in
juries of the esophagus can be managed successfully by conservative me
asures and pleural drainage, with surgical procedures reserved for lar
ge disruptions of the esophagus, intraabdominal perforations, and case
s that do not respond to appropriate conservative measures. Patients w
ith caustic injury to the esophagus have a greater risk for the develo
pment of penetrating injury, and this may be one indicator of the seve
rity of scarring. There are distinct clinical patterns of presentation
, which depend on the level at which the esophagus is perforated. Dila
tation disruption of a localized stricture has a good long-term progno
sis for the esophagus and may even cure the stricture. The role of ora
l irrigation still must be fully evaluated where disruption has occurr
ed as distinct from a penetrating injury. Copyright (C) 1996 by W.B. S
aunders Company