Mhp. Stollman et al., DETECTION OF THE BINAURAL INTERACTION COMPONENT IN THE AUDITORY BRAIN-STEM RESPONSE, British journal of audiology, 30(3), 1996, pp. 227-232
In humans, the binaural interaction at the brainstem level has been st
udied for over 15 years. The binaural interaction component (BIG) is o
btained by subtracting the summed auditory brainstem response (ABR) in
the monaural stimulus mode from the ABR obtained in the binaural stim
ulus mode. By nature of this subtraction process, the signal-to-noise
ratio of the difference waveform is poor, requiring an objective detec
tion criterion to decide whether a significant BIC is present. In this
study, the effectiveness of two analysis methods was compared. The fi
rst method is the '3 SD' method, which is based on a signal-to-noise e
valuation. The second method is a template matching method, in which t
emplates are derived from normal hearing subjects' responses and indiv
idual responses are cross-correlated with these templates. The templat
es were allowed to shift over a range of -0.8 to 0.8 ms in search of t
he maximum correlation coefficient. Thirty-nine subjects with normal h
earing and five patients with a unilateral profound hearing loss parti
cipated in the study. ABRs were obtained with rarefaction and condensa
tion clicks at a rate of 15/s and a level of 70 dB nHL. Latencies of t
he ABR waves I, III and V for all normal hearing subjects and for the
normal ear of the patients were within the normal range. The efficienc
ies of both methods, defined as the number of normal hearing adults wi
th a significant BIC plus the number of patients without a significant
BIC divided by the total number of subjects, were determined. The res
ults show that the '3 SD' method is superior to the template matching
method; the efficiencies were 95% and 70% respectively, when responses
to rarefaction and condensation clicks were taken together. With the
'3 SD' method, a significant BIC is demonstrated in almost all normal
hearing subjects (97%). However, the '3 SD' method also falsely indica
ted a significant BIC in one patient. These results suggest that the B
IC may have clinical value in studying binaural interaction in humans.