R. Montironi et al., EVALUATION OF PROSTATIC INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA AFTER TREATMENT WITH A 5-ALPHA-REDUCTASE INHIBITOR (FINASTERIDE) - A METHODOLOGIC APPROACH, Analytical and quantitative cytology and histology, 18(6), 1996, pp. 461-470
OBJECTIVE: To develop a methodology applicable to the morphologic stud
y of the efficacy of finasteride on prostatic intraepithelial neoplasi
a (PIN), a putative precursor of prostate cancer. STUDY DESIGN: Three
PIN foci were reviewed in two simple prostatectomy specimens from pati
ents with clinical diagnoses of benign prostatic hyperplasia and treat
ed with finasteride for six months. The feasibility of PIN diagnosis a
nd golding based on ''diagnostic distance'' was investigated. It is a
measure of the ''extent'' to which the observed features are different
from those of the untreated prototypes representing the following dia
gnostic categories: normal prostate, lo so and high grade PIN and pros
tatic adenocarcinoma with a cribriform or large acinar pattern. Uncert
ainty in the PIN diagnosis and grading was dealt with by means of a Ba
yesian belief network (BBN). RESULTS: The distance measure values gf t
he three PIN foci from the prototype of untreated, nonneoplastic prost
ate were 9, 7 and 8, respectively, in relative, arbitrary units. Their
distance from the two prostate cancer patterns (large acinar and crib
riform) tons as high as 8-10. The distances of these foci from either
low or high grade PIN were as low as 5, 3 and 2, and 3, 5 and 4, respe
ctively. BBN produced the highest belief values for PIN, thus confirmi
ng the morphology-based and diagnostic distance-supported diagnosis; h
owever, the belief values were low for both grades. CONCLUSION: The re
sults provided by BBN analyses and diagnostic distance measures suppor
t the conclusion that this methodology is applicable to assessing the
efficacy of finasteride treatment of PIN.