COMPARATIVE USEFULNESS OF RIBOTYPING, EXOTOXIN-A GENOTYPING, AND SALIRESTRICTION-FRAGMENT-LENGTH-POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS FOR PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA LINEAGE ASSESSMENT
Mm. Nociari et al., COMPARATIVE USEFULNESS OF RIBOTYPING, EXOTOXIN-A GENOTYPING, AND SALIRESTRICTION-FRAGMENT-LENGTH-POLYMORPHISM ANALYSIS FOR PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA LINEAGE ASSESSMENT, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 24(4), 1996, pp. 179-190
Ribotyping, exotoxin A genotyping (EAGP), and restriction fragment len
gth polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of total DNA with SalI (SalI RFLP) we
re compared for intraspecics discrimination of 93 Pseudomonas aerugino
sa isolates. Type-ability of all methods was 100% and the results of t
yping with each method remained unchanged during laboratory manipulati
on. Clonal groups defined with each molecular method were largely coin
cident and, in those cases where inconsistencies were detected, isolat
es were analyzed by transverse alternating field gel electrophoresis (
TAFE) and arbitrarily primed polymerase chain reaction (AP-PCR). SalI
RFLP analysis was highly discriminative so as to distinguish unrelated
isolates of close lineage. However, it was not a good method to ident
ify isolates of unrelated lineage because SalI RFLP appealed to be sub
jected to convergent evolution. The index of discrimination suggested
by Hunter and Gaston was determined to assess the discriminatory power
of the molecular methods utilized either alone or in several combinat
ions. Combined use of ribotyping and SalI RFLP analysis reached the hi
ghest index of discrimination (0.982) and proved to be a very valuable
tool for epidemiological differentiation of P. aeruginosa isolates.