Y. Sbihi et al., SEROLOGIC RECOGNITION OF HYDATID CYST ANTIGENS USING DIFFERENT PURIFICATION METHODS, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 24(4), 1996, pp. 205-211
The specificity and sensitivity of enzyme-2-linked immunosorbent assay
s (ELISA) and Western immunoblot assays in detecting antibodies in ser
um from patients suffering cystic hydatid disease (Echinococcus granul
osus) are compared using either crude antigen preparations (total shee
p hydatid fluid and homogenates of protoscoleces), purified fractions
enriched in Antigens 5 and B, and glycoproteins from hydatid fluid. Po
lyprotein bands of 12-14, 20, and 34 kDn, when purified from hydatid f
luid by applying changes in the ionic strength, yielded a sensitive (9
5%) immunodiagnostic test that was also extremely specific (100%) when
assayed with sera from noninfected humans and from patients suffering
from other parasitic disease. However, subjecting hydatid fluid to ch
romatography through a concanavilin A column rendered a 42 kDa band th
at was sensitive (95%) was well as highly specific (100%) for hydatido
sis. Therefore, purification procedures can strongly affect the diagno
stic value of antigens with identical electrophoretic behavior in sodi
um dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).