SEROLOGIC RECOGNITION OF HYDATID CYST ANTIGENS USING DIFFERENT PURIFICATION METHODS

Citation
Y. Sbihi et al., SEROLOGIC RECOGNITION OF HYDATID CYST ANTIGENS USING DIFFERENT PURIFICATION METHODS, Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 24(4), 1996, pp. 205-211
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Microbiology,"Infectious Diseases
ISSN journal
07328893
Volume
24
Issue
4
Year of publication
1996
Pages
205 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0732-8893(1996)24:4<205:SROHCA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
The specificity and sensitivity of enzyme-2-linked immunosorbent assay s (ELISA) and Western immunoblot assays in detecting antibodies in ser um from patients suffering cystic hydatid disease (Echinococcus granul osus) are compared using either crude antigen preparations (total shee p hydatid fluid and homogenates of protoscoleces), purified fractions enriched in Antigens 5 and B, and glycoproteins from hydatid fluid. Po lyprotein bands of 12-14, 20, and 34 kDn, when purified from hydatid f luid by applying changes in the ionic strength, yielded a sensitive (9 5%) immunodiagnostic test that was also extremely specific (100%) when assayed with sera from noninfected humans and from patients suffering from other parasitic disease. However, subjecting hydatid fluid to ch romatography through a concanavilin A column rendered a 42 kDa band th at was sensitive (95%) was well as highly specific (100%) for hydatido sis. Therefore, purification procedures can strongly affect the diagno stic value of antigens with identical electrophoretic behavior in sodi um dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE).