S. Eggli et al., BILATERAL TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY - ONE-STAGE VERSUS 2-STAGE PROCEDURE, Clinical orthopaedics and related research, (328), 1996, pp. 108-118
The purpose of this study was to determine if any differences existed
in the early complication fate, short term clinical outcome, and total
length of hospital stay between patients who had bilateral total hip
arthroplasty performed under a single anesthetic (during 1 patient vis
it to the operating room) and patients who had the procedure performed
under 2 anesthetics (during 2 patient visits to the operating room),
Patients operated on bilaterally were divided into 3 groups: Group A (
1 stage procedure)-hips that were operated on simultaneously (128 hips
); Group B (2 stage procedure)-surgeries performed less than 6 weeks a
part (126 hips); and Group C (2 stage procedure)-surgeries performed b
etween 5 weeks and 6 months apart (256 hips), All patients were evalua
ted after an average followup of 1.5 years, There were no differences
in operative, early local, or general complications among the 3 groups
, In particular, no higher incidence of pulmonary embolism or deep vei
n thrombosis was found in the 1 stage group, Preoperatively, very stif
f hips (total range of motion < 50 degrees) gained significantly more
motion in the 1 stage group than in the 2 stage groups, whereas hips w
ith better preoperative motion (total range of motion > 50 degrees) im
proved the most in Group B, without a significant difference occurring
between Groups A and C. The degree of pain reduction was the same in
all groups, but patients in the 1 stage group had a significantly bett
er capacity for walking after their procedure, Average total hospital
stay was 5 to 6 days less for the patients in Group A than those in th
e other groups, which, combined with using the operating room only onc
e, resulted in a reduction of overall hospital rests by more than 30%
when using the 1 stage procedure.