Background. The Monostrut valve is a pyrolytic carbon, tilting-disc pr
osthesis with no welds. After the first implantation in Spain in May 1
983, the Spanish Monostrut Study Group was established to evaluate pro
spectively the performance of the valve using uniform protocols. Metho
ds. During a 10-year period, 8,599 Monostrut valves were implanted in
7,317 patients in 22 centers. Mean age was 53.3 +/- 11 years. Of the t
otal group, 3,229 underwent aortic valve replacement, 2,806 had mitral
valve replacement, and 1,282 had double valve replacement. Follow-up
was 96% complete, with a mean period of 4.3 years and a total of 29,15
5 patient-years. Results. The operative mortality rate was 7.2%. The 1
0-year probability of freedom from valve-related complications and lin
earized rates (event/100 patient-years in parentheses) were as follows
: structural deterioration, 100% (0); nonstructural dysfunction, 96% /- 0.5% (0.51); thromboembolism, 82.9% +/- 1.5% (1.32); anticoagulant-
related hemorrhage, 87.6% +/- 1.4% (0.98); and prosthetic valve endoca
rditis, 96.1% +/- 0.5% (0.48). There were five obstructive valve throm
boses (0.017/100 patient-years). Actuarial freedom from reoperation wa
s 95% +/- 0.5% at 10 years. Actuarial freedom from all valve-related m
orbidity was 70.2% +/- 1.6%; freedom from all valve-related morbidity
and mortality (including operative and sudden deaths) was 62.6% +/- 2%
(70.1% +/- 2% for aortic valve replacement, 56.9% +/- 2% for mitral v
alve replacement, iand and 59.8% +/- 3% for double valve replacement;
p < 0.0001). Clinically, 5,988 patients (94%) are in New York Heart As
sociation class I-II. Conclusions. The Monostrut valve has shown no st
ructural failures and a low rate of valve-related complications over a
10-year period in a large patient population.