COMPARISON OF THE RELATIVE ABILITIES OF ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY, RHINOMANOMETRY, AND THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE IN DETECTING CHANGE IN THE NASAL CAVITY IN A HEALTHY ADULT-POPULATION
A. Tomkinson et R. Eccles, COMPARISON OF THE RELATIVE ABILITIES OF ACOUSTIC RHINOMETRY, RHINOMANOMETRY, AND THE VISUAL ANALOG SCALE IN DETECTING CHANGE IN THE NASAL CAVITY IN A HEALTHY ADULT-POPULATION, American journal of rhinology, 10(3), 1996, pp. 161-165
The relative abilities of acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and sub
jective sensation of nasal patency, as recorded using a Visual Analogu
e Scale (VAS) were compared in a group of 51 healthy volunteers. All t
hree methods were able to detect a change following the application of
a nasal decongestant. A 27.5% change in minimum cross sectional area,
a 13.29% change in nasal resistance, and a 30.7% change in the sensat
ion of nasal patency was observed No correlation was demonstrated betw
een either acoustic rhinometry or rhinomanometry and subjective sensat
ion, and only a weak correlation was found between acoustic rhinometry
and rhinomanometry.