J. Johansson et al., ADENOCARCINOMA IN THE DISTAL ESOPHAGUS WITH AND WITHOUT BARRETT-ESOPHAGUS - DIFFERENCES IN SYMPTOMS AND SURVIVAL RATES, Archives of surgery, 131(7), 1996, pp. 708-713
Objective: To evaluate differences in clinical appearance and survival
rates in patients operated on for adenocarcinoma in the distal esopha
gus with and without Barrett epithelium. Design: Prospective clinical
study. Setting: University hospital, Sweden. Patients: Fifty-four pati
ents with adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus with (n=17) or withou
t (n=37) Barrett epithelium. Intervention: Esophagectomy or total gast
rectomy. Main Outcome Measures: Preoperative symptoms, endoscopic resu
lts, and histological findings; postoperative morbidity, mortality, an
d survival rates. Results: The main indication for the endoscopic exam
ination that revealed tumor in the group with Barrett esophagus was re
flux-related symptoms in 6 patients (routine Barrett examination, n=4;
symptoms of reflux, n=2), symptoms related to upper gastrointestinal
tract bleeding in 6, and malignant symptoms in 5 (dysphagia, n=4; weig
ht loss, n=1). In contrast, most patients in the cardia cancer group w
ere admitted because of malignant symptoms (dysphagia, n=26; epigastri
c pain, n=9; and anemia, n=2). Ten of 17 patients in the Barrett esoph
agus cancer group had tumors limited to the mucosa and submucosa only.
In 1 patient the tumor grew into the muscular layer but not through i
t. In the remaining 6 patients the tumor did grow through the muscular
layer and lymph node metastases were found. Wall penetration was foun
d in 30 patients and metastases to lymph nodes in 29 patients in the c
ardia cancer group. The hospital mortality rate was 0 of 1.7 patients
in the Barrett cancer group and 2 of 37 patients in the cardia cancer
group. In the patients operated on for adenocarcinoma in the distal es
ophagus, a better long-term survival rate was seen in those with Barre
tt epithelium (50%) than in those without this metaplasia (10%) (log r
ank P=.005; chi(2)=7.80). Conclusions: Concomitant Barrett epithelium
improved the prognosis for patients with adenocarcinoma in the distal
esophagus. Probably the reason for this was a higher rate of early-sta
ge disease, because symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux and other beni
gn disorders, not dysphagia, were most common in patients with adenoca
rcinoma without Barret epithelium in the distal esophagus.