This paper examines the quantitative relationships between dust loadin
g, lead loading, and lead concentration in house dust. Bare floor, int
erior sill, and carpet dust samples were collected in 216 Jersey City,
New Jersey, homes using quantitative wipe and vacuum sampling techniq
ues. Comparison of wipe and vacuum sample distributions for these home
s indicated that lead loading was more variable than dust loading or l
ead concentration measured on floors, sills, or carpets. These data al
so indicated that increased lead loading on carpets relative to sills
or floors was due to higher dust loading on carpets. Correlation analy
sis of wipe samples indicated that dust loading was more strongly corr
elated with lead loading on floors (r = 0.73) than on sills (r = 0.53)
, that dust loading was not correlated with lead concentration on eith
er surface, and that lead loading and lead concentration were more str
ongly correlated in samples collected from sills (r = 0.81) than from
floors (r = 0.65). Most importantly, carpets and rugs served as large
reservoirs for house dust and consequently were a large potential sour
ce of dust exposure in children's common microenvironments. (C) 1995 A
cademic Press, Inc.