O. Nativ et al., A COMPARISON BETWEEN HISTOLOGICAL GRADE AND NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRY FOR PREDICTING THE CLINICAL OUTCOME OF LOCALIZED RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA, British Journal of Urology, 78(1), 1996, pp. 33-38
Objectives To determine the interrelationship of histological grade an
d nuclear morphometry and to compare their prognostic significance in
patients with localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients and metho
ds A retrospective prognostic study of 39 patients with localized (pT1
, pT2) RCC was performed, Conventional histological grade and nuclear
morphometry were assessed independently and the correlation between th
ese grading systems and their impact on the patients' outcome were eva
luated. Results Histological grade and the nuclear morphometric variab
les were significantly correlated; the strongest association was that
between grade and the nuclear regularity factor. The best predictor of
disease-free interval and survival (by univariate analysis) was the c
ombination of nuclear area and nuclear elongation factor, followed by
conventional tumour grade, nuclear elongation factor, nuclear regulari
ty factor and nuclear area. However, a multivariate analysis showed th
at the only independent prognosticator for survival was the combinatio
n of nuclear area and nuclear elongation factor. Conclusions This stud
y indicates that nuclear morphometry is prognostically superior to his
tological grade in patients with localized RCC.