COMPARISON OF RHEUMATOID-FACTOR ASSAY SYS TEMS - EVIDENCE AND CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON PRE-TEST-PROBABILITY AND POST-TEST-PROBABILITY
Kr. Aupperle et al., COMPARISON OF RHEUMATOID-FACTOR ASSAY SYS TEMS - EVIDENCE AND CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF SENSITIVITY, SPECIFICITY AND THEIR INFLUENCE ON PRE-TEST-PROBABILITY AND POST-TEST-PROBABILITY, Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 55(3), 1996, pp. 158-167
In this prospective study, sera of 440 patients with rheumatic and deg
enerative joint diseases were tested for the presence of rheumatoid fa
ctor (RF). The Latex agglutination test (LFT), Waaler-Rose hemagglutin
ation, laser nephelometry and IgM-Enzyme immunoassay (IgM-EIA) were us
ed for detecting IgM-rheumatoid factors. In addition, rheumatoid facto
r of IgA isotype was measured by an IgA-Enzyme immunoassay. Sensitivit
y, specificity, pre-test- and post-test-probability were evaluated bas
ed on the data obtained to compare the test systems used. Under prospe
ctive patient selection, none of the test systems used reached a sensi
tivity of 100% concerning its cut off level. Despite this limitation,
latex agglutination and IgM-EIA reached the highest sensitivity. Waale
r-Rose test (90,8%) showed the best result for specificity. The IgA-EI
A held the third position in sensitivity, specificity and efficiency B
y comparing sensitivity with specificity, no test system can be recogn
ized as the absolutely best one, since the receiver operating characte
ristic curves (ROC) overlapped. Practically rheumatoid factor measurem
ent should initially use a highly sensitive assay, such as LFT and IgM
-EIA to screen for RE In the case of a positive result a more specific
assay should be used, for example laser nephelometry, to confirm the
result.