EVIDENCE FOR A SELECTIVE EFFECT OF ETHANOL ON N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE RESPONSES - ETHANOL AFFECTS A SUBTYPE OF THE IFENPRODIL-SENSITIVE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE RECEPTORS
Xh. Yang et al., EVIDENCE FOR A SELECTIVE EFFECT OF ETHANOL ON N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE RESPONSES - ETHANOL AFFECTS A SUBTYPE OF THE IFENPRODIL-SENSITIVE N-METHYL-D-ASPARTATE RECEPTORS, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 278(1), 1996, pp. 114-124
An extracellular electrophysiological approach was used to determine t
he effect of ethanol on responses to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) acros
s several brain regions in urethane-anesthetized rats. The results ind
icated that, in most brain regions, ethanol inhibited the NMDA-induced
increases in firing rate for some, but not all, spontaneously active
neurons. Ethanol functioned as an NMDA antagonist for some neurons in
the medial septum, red nucleus, deep mesencephalic nucleus, substantia
nigra reticulata, ventral tegmental area and cerebellum. In the hippo
campus, ethanol inhibited NMDA responses from all neurons, However, et
hanol was not found to be active against NMDA responses in the lateral
septum, suggesting that there is a degree of regional specificity for
ethanol inhibition of NMDA responses. It was then established in unan
esthetized rats that ethanol also antagonized responses to NMDA in som
e, but not ail, neurons in the medial septum and cortex, indicating th
at the differential action of ethanol on NMDA responses obtained in th
e urethane-anesthetized rats was not due to the anesthetic. Based on a
n earlier study showing that the effects of ifenprodil and ethanol on
NMDA responses were correlated, the ability of ethanol to inhibit NMDA
responses was compared with changes produced by ifenprodil on the sam
e neurons, where ethanol did or did not affect NMDA responses. In the
several brain regions investigated,ethanol inhibited NMDA responses in
a subgroup of neurons in which ifenprodil inhibited NMDA-induced incr
eases in firing. For all neurons investigated, if a cell was insensiti
ve to ifenprodil antagonism of NMDA responses then ethanol also was in
effective against the response to NMDA. These results suggest that eth
anol acts on an ifenprodil-sensitive NMDA receptor subtype. Given that
previous investigations have suggested that the NMDA receptor type 2B
subunit is essential for the action of ifenprodil, the positive relat
ionship between the actions of ifenprodil and ethanol on responses to
NMDA is consistent with the hypothesis that the combination of specifi
c receptor subunits forming an NMDA receptor on a neuron determines th
e ability of ethanol to antagonize an NMDA response.