Tw. Vanderah et al., ENHANCEMENT OF MORPHINE ANTINOCICEPTION BY A CCKB ANTAGONIST IN MICE IS MEDIATED VIA OPIOID-DELTA RECEPTORS, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 278(1), 1996, pp. 212-219
This study investigated the possible involvement of opioid delta recep
tors in the modulation of morphine antinociceptive potency produced by
L365,260, a CCKB antagonist. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.), intrat
hecal (i.th.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) L365,260 alone did not produce an
y antinociceptive actions in the mouse warm-water tail-flick test. Tre
atment with L365,260 by any of these routes produced a leftward shift
of the corresponding morphine dose-effect curve that was blocked by pr
etreatment with a receptor-selective dose of s.c. naltrindole, an opio
id delta receptor antagonist. Pretreatment with i.c.v. antisera to [Le
u(5)]enkephalin also blocked the leftward displacement of the i.c.v. m
orphine dose-effect curve resulting from L365,260 but did not directly
alter the i.c.v. morphine dose-effect curve; antisera to [Met(5)]enke
phalin did not alter the effects of morphine or the modulation of morp
hine antinociception produced by L365,260. Repeated pretreatment with
L365,260 resulted in a progressive decrease in the magnitude of the mo
rphine modulatory action (i.e., L365,260 ''tolerance''). In these ''L3
65,260-tolerant'' mice, the dose-effect curve for i.c.v. [D-Ala(2), Gl
u(4)]deltorphin (a selective delta agonist) was displaced to the right
by approximately 8.2-fold. The i.c.v. administration of [Leu(5)]enkep
halin produced a leftward displacement of the i.c.v. morphine dose;eff
ect curve that diminished after repeated administration (i.e., [Leu(5)
]enkephalin ''tolerance''). In ''[Leu(5)]enkephalin-tolerant'' mice, L
365,260 failed to produce the leftward shift of the morphine dose-effe
ct curve seen in central animals. That is, two-way antinociceptive cro
ss-tolerance was observed between an opioid delta agonist and a CCKB r
eceptor antagonist. Intracerebroventricular thiorphan, a peptidase inh
ibitor, did not elicit antinociception directly. Co-administration of
thiorphan with L365,260 elicited significant antinociception that was
blocked by naltrindole or antisera to [Leu(5)]enkephalin; antisera to
[Met(5)]enkephalin had no effect. Repeated administration of i.c.v. [D
-Ala(2), Glu(4)]deltorphin resulted in a progressively decreasing anti
nociceptive effect (i.e., [D-Ala(2), Glu(4)]deltorphin ''tolerance'').
In ''[D-Ala(2), Glu(4)]deltorphin-tolerant'' mice, the thiorphan/L365
,260 antinociceptive effect was inhibited. Collectively, these data su
ggest that CCK interacts at the CCKB receptor to inhibit tonically the
release and/or availability of an endogenous substance acting at opio
id delta receptors. The subsequent enhancement of morphine antinocicep
tive potency may reflect the well-known modulation of morphine antinoc
iception produced by opioid delta receptor agonists. In this case, the
latter may be [Leu(5)]enkephalin or a [Leu(5)]enkephalin-like substan
ce.