Previous research, using both magnitude-scaling and direct-comparison
methods, has shown the perception of loudness to be contingent on the
distribution of tonal stimuli varying in sound frequency as well as SP
L: When a low-frequency signal, f(1), is presented at low SPLs and a h
igh-frequency signal, f(2), at high SPLs, loudness at f(1) is great re
lative to that at f(2); reversing the association of SPL with frequenc
y reverses the loudness relation. These shifts in relative loudness, r
ecently termed ''recalibration'' [Marks, J. Exp. Psychol. 19, 227-249
(1994)], are consistent with the operation of frequency-specific, fati
guelike processes at f(1) and f(2). Experiment 1 combined both scaling
(magnitude estimation) and matching (direct-comparison) methods and s
howed that exposing one ear to recalibrating stimuli (500 and 2500 Hz)
led to substantial shifts not only in the ipsilateral ear but also in
the contralateral ear (albeit smaller ones). Experiment 2 used a sele
ctive-exposure procedure and gave similar results. Thus the processes
underlying recalibration of loudness appear to involve central mediati
on; consequently, it is possible that processes of auditory fatigue re
ly on central as well as peripheral mechanisms. (C) 1996 Acoustical So
ciety of America.