P. Anract et al., SYNOVIAL CHONDROMATOSIS AND CHONDROSARCOM A - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THESE 2 DISEASES, Revue de chirurgie orthopedique et reparatrice de l'appareil moteur, 82(3), 1996, pp. 216-224
Purpose of the study This retrospective study concerns six patients in
whom chondrosarcoma was suspected to develop in synovial chondromatos
is. We discuss for these cases different diagnosis. The authors expose
the clinical signs and radiological aspects which suggest malignant t
ransformation. We report the indispensable criteria for established di
agnosis of malignant transformation of synovial chondromatosis and app
ropriated forms of therapeutic management were suggested. Materials an
d methods Six patients, 3 males and 3 females from 36 to 58 years of a
ge were included in this study. Three patients presented 6 months, 3 y
ears and 25 years history of synovial chondromatosis of the knee joint
. When the malignant transformation appeared, a surgical biopsy was pe
rformed and the pathologist diagnosed a chondrosarcoma in all cases. F
or the other three patients, the chondrosarcoma and synovial chondroma
tosis were diagnosed at the same time. The localization was shoulder,
hip and knee. A surgical biopsy was performed and the pathologist diag
nosed chondrosarcoma. Synovial chondromatosis was diagnosed by histolo
gic examination of the resection or amputation specimen. Treatment and
results Four patients had thigh amputation, one patient had ''en bloc
resection'' of the hip-joint and the last patient had resection of th
e shoulder joint. In all cases, the histologic examination diagnosed c
hondrosarcoma and synovial chondromatosis. All patients were free of d
isease. Discussion The malignant transformation of synovial chondromat
osis is rare but this diagnosis must be established to perform appropr
iate treatment. Other possible diagnosis are : - low grade synovial ch
ondrosarcoma initially diagnosed as a synovial chondromatosis. Bertoni
believes that all cases of malignant transformation of synovial chond
romatosis are initially low grade chondrosarcoma. We believe that his
criteria are too strict for diagnosed chondrosarcoma. - coexistence of
synovial chondromatosis and synovial chondrosarcoma. These 2 diagnosi
s are extremely rare and their coexistence are unlikely. - secondary s
ynovial chondromatosis developed into chondrosarcoma. We don't have hi
stologic criteria to confirm this diagnosis in all our cases. The symp
toms that should suggest a malignant transformation of synovial chondr
omatosis were: - rapid late deterioration of clinical conditions, - bo
ne invasion diagnosed by X-ray films and medullar invasion discovered
by MRI. According to us, the indispensable criteria to diagnose malign
ant transformation were: 1 degrees) histologic diagnosis of synovial c
hondromatosis established before diagnosis of chondrosarcoma, 2 degree
s) histologic diagnosis of chondrosarcoma on the same anatomic site as
the synovial chondromatosis, 3 degrees) diagnosis of chondrosarcoma a
nd synovial chondromatosis on the same resection specimen. Only the th
ree first cases were in accordance with these criteria. The treatment
must be a ''en bloc resection'' of the joint or an amputation. Conclus
ion Malignant transformation is rare, but this diagnosis should be est
ablished to perform adequat treatment, This diagnosis should be suspec
ted when a rapid deterioration of the clinical status appeared and whe
n bone involvement was detected by MRI. However, the danger still lies
in the misinterpretation of the synovial chondromatosis as chondrosar
coma. This diagnosis can be made with clinical, radiological and patho
logical criteria. The treatment must be a wide resection or an amputat
ion.