INTERACTION WITH THE AROMATIC HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR, CYP1A INDUCTION, AND MUTAGENICITY OF A SERIES OF DIAMINOTOLUENES - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEIR CARCINOGENICITY

Citation
Yl. Cheung et al., INTERACTION WITH THE AROMATIC HYDROCARBON RECEPTOR, CYP1A INDUCTION, AND MUTAGENICITY OF A SERIES OF DIAMINOTOLUENES - IMPLICATIONS FOR THEIR CARCINOGENICITY, Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 139(1), 1996, pp. 203-211
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Pharmacy",Toxicology
ISSN journal
0041008X
Volume
139
Issue
1
Year of publication
1996
Pages
203 - 211
Database
ISI
SICI code
0041-008X(1996)139:1<203:IWTAHR>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
The present study was undertaken to provide a rationale for the marked difference in carcinogenic potential among isomeric diaminotoluenes, in relation to their ability to induce their own bioactivation through CYP1A induction, their genotoxic potential, and their ability to bind to the cytosolic aromatic hydrocarbon (Ah) receptor, Of the four poss ible diaminotoluenes only the 2,3- and, to a lesser extent, the 2,4-is omer induced CYP1A activity, Similarly, only these two isomers could d isplace [H-3]T-CDD from the hepatic cytosolic Ah receptor, In the pres ence of Aroclor 1254-induced microsomes, 2,4- and 2,6-diaminotoluene w ere potent mutagens in the Ames test. Only 2,4-diaminotoluene could au toinduce its activation. Of the four isomers only 2,4-diaminotoluene i s an established carcinogen and this is compatible with the present ob servations that it is the only isomer that stimulates its own activati on through CYP1A induction, is metabolically converted to genotoxic in termediates, and binds to the Ah receptor, 2,6-Diaminotoluene is recog nized as a mutagenic noncarcinogen and in the present studies it elici ted a positive mutagenic response in the Ames test but failed to induc e CYP1A activity and its own activation, and could not bind to the Ah receptor even at concentrations as high as 5 x 10(-4) M. The present f indings demonstrate that in vitro studies are very useful tools in pre dicting the carcinogenic potency of isomeric chemicals. (C) 1996 Acade mic Press, Inc.