Phylogenetic relationships of 9 species of ticks were inferred from nu
cleotide sequences of the D1 domain of large subunit ribosomal DNA (rD
NA), the V4 region of small subunit rDNA and sequences immediately adj
acent to these regions. Six of the 7 subfamilies in the Argasidae and
Ixodidae were represented: Ornithodorinae and Argasinae from the Argas
idae (soft ticks); and Ixodinae, Amblyomminae, Haemaphysalinae and Rhi
picephalinae from the Ixodidae (hard ticks). A mite, Phytoseiulus pers
imilis, from the Mesostigmata, the putative sister group of the Ixodid
a, was used for out-group reference. Our sequence alignment, which con
tained the D1, V4 and adjacent sequences, comprised 503 sites; 209 of
these varied among the species studied and 77 were phylogenetically in
formative, i.e. at least 2 different nucleotides were represented at l
east twice. This alignment was subjected to maximum parsimony, genetic
distance and maximum likelihood analyses. We found strong support in
bootstrap resampling experiments for the following relationships: (i)
monophyly of the 7 species of Ixodidae (98-100% support); (ii) monophy
ly of the 2 species of Amblyomma (93-99%); (iii) monophyly of the 6 sp
ecies of Metastriata (96-99%); (iv) a sister-group relationship betwee
n Ixodes pilosus and the 6 species of Metastriata (98-100%); and (v) a
sister-group relationship between Ornithodoros capensis (Ornithodorin
ae) and the 7 species of Ixodidae (94-99% support). The last result ma
y be preliminary evidence that the Argasidae family (soft ticks) is pa
raphyletic since the 2 argasid species did not form a monophyletic gro
up. The paraphyletic status of the Argasidae has been previously sugge
sted by Black & Piesman (1994; Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences U.S.A. 91: 10034). Our study indicates that the D1, V4 and ad
jacent sequences may be used to answer long-standing questions about t
he phylogeny of the Ixodida. Copyright (C) 1996 Australian Society for
Parasitology. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.