FACTORS PREDICTING COMPLETE REMISSION AND SUBSEQUENT DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL AFTER A 2ND COURSE OF INDUCTION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA RESISTANT TO THE FIRST
P. Anderlini et al., FACTORS PREDICTING COMPLETE REMISSION AND SUBSEQUENT DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL AFTER A 2ND COURSE OF INDUCTION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA RESISTANT TO THE FIRST, Leukemia, 10(6), 1996, pp. 964-969
Patients with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) with pe
rsistent leukemia after their first course (CO1) of induction chemothe
rapy are generally given a second similar couse, although their outcom
e is known to be worse than CO1 responders even when a complete remiss
ion (CR) is achieved. To identify specific patients who should or shou
ld not receive a second induction course identical to the first we ana
lyzed outcome in 370 patients with persistent AML after CO1 who receiv
ed a second identical course. One hundred and forty-two (38%) achieved
CR on this course; median subsequent disease-free survival (DFS) in t
hese 142 was 29 weeks and 10% were alive in CR at 5 years. The 5-year
DFS of CO2 responders was significantly lower than that of CO1 respond
ers (10 vs 24%, P < 0.001). Logistic regression identified pretreatmen
t cytogenetic abnormalities (except inv 16, t(8;21), or t(15;17)), pre
sence of an antecedent hematologic disorder or secondary AML as each h
aving unfavorable prognostic import similar to the case in untreated p
atients. Treatment with 'high-dose' rather than standard-dose cytarabi
ne increased the probability of 2nd course CR. The occurrence of pneum
onia, sepsis, or major hemorrhage were prognostically unfavorable, pri
marily in the high-dose cytarabine group, and, once in CR, DFS was sho
rter in this group. Equations predicting probability of 2nd course CR
were derived, If validated prospectively these could be used to assign
patients to either receive a second course of initial induction thera
py or to change to salvage or investigational therapy after the first
course. Alternatively, they could be used to stratify patients enterin
g a prospective randomized trial comparing these two strategies.