BER-EP4 FOR DIFFERENTIATING ADENOCARCINOMA FROM REACTIVE AND NEOPLASTIC MESOTHELIAL CELLS IN SEROUS EFFUSIONS - COMPARISON WITH CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN, B72.3 AND LEU-M1
Me. Bailey et al., BER-EP4 FOR DIFFERENTIATING ADENOCARCINOMA FROM REACTIVE AND NEOPLASTIC MESOTHELIAL CELLS IN SEROUS EFFUSIONS - COMPARISON WITH CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN, B72.3 AND LEU-M1, Acta cytologica, 40(6), 1996, pp. 1212-1216
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of Ber-EP4 in distinguishing epith
elial cells from mesothelial cells in routine cytologic preparations.
STUDY DESIGN: Paraffin-embedded cell blocks of serous effusions from 3
2 patients (11 metastatic adenocarcinomas, 16 reactive mesothelial pro
liferations and 5 malignant mesotheliomas) were immunostained with Ber
-EP4. For comparison, cell block preparations of adenocarcinomas and m
esotheliomas were also immunostained with the most commonly applied ma
rkers of adenocarcinoma: carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), B72.3 and Leu
-M1. In addition, cytocentrifuge preparations of 14 reactive effusions
and 2 metastatic adenocarcinomas were stained prospectively with Ber-
EP4. RESULTS: All adenocarcinomas showed intense membrane staining, wh
ile all mesothelial proliferations, both benign and malignant, were ne
gative. The Ber-EP4-positive immunostaining was remarkably clean, with
very minimal nonspecific staining. CEA stained 11/11 adenocarcinomas,
B72.3 stained 10/11, and Leu-M1 stained 8/11; mesotheliomas were nega
tive with all three antibodies. CONCLUSION: Ber-EP4 is at least as use
ful as CEA, B72.3 and Leu-M1 in the diagnosis of serous effusions. It
has the advantage of high sensitivity and ease of interpretation becau
se of the high percentage of tumor cells stained, characteristic membr
anous staining and lack of cross-reaction with background inflammatory
cells.