Hm. Dey et al., COMPARISON OF NIFEDIPINE GITS AND HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH STAGE I-III DIASTOLIC HYPERTENSION, American journal of hypertension, 9(6), 1996, pp. 598-606
A randomized, double blind, parallel study was performed to compare th
e effects of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) to
hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in the management of the elderly hypertensi
ve. Eighteen patients, mean age 65 +/- 5 years, with Stage I-III diast
olic hypertension (sitting diastolic BP between 90 and 115 mm Hg) were
included in each treatment group. Following a 2 to 8 week placebo was
hout phase, patients received either nifedipine GITS or HCTZ and were
titrated over 5 weeks to achieve a goal diastolic blood pressure less
than 90 mm Hg. Patients were then continued on medication during an 8
week maintenance phase. Treatment effect on systolic and diastolic blo
od pressure was assessed. Serum electrolytes, lipids, blood urea nitro
gen, and creatinine were measured before and after treatment. Posttrea
tment changes in renal and cardiovascular function, as well as left ve
ntricular mass were evaluated. The results showed significant reductio
ns in systolic and diastolic blood pressure with both drugs; no treatm
ent difference was found, although goal blood pressure was achieved mo
re rapidly with nifedipine GITS (28 v 34 days, P <.05). BUN was signif
icantly increased only after diuretic therapy (P <.01) and serum potas
sium fell to a greater degree with HCTZ (0.3 mEq/L v 0.1 mEq/L) than w
ith nifedipine GITS. No statistically significant changes in left vent
ricular mass, ejection fraction, glomerular filtration rate, or renal
blood now were seen after therapy with either drug. However, the time
to peak LV diastolic filling rate decreased with nifedipine GITS (197
to 164 msec) and increased with HCTZ (172 to 198 msec). This treatment
difference approached statistical significance (P =.07). Adverse side
effects of treatment were reported by 50% of nifedipine GITS patients
and 28% of patients treated with HCTZ. This treatment difference was
not statistically significant. We conclude that both nifedipine GITS a
nd HCTZ monotherapy provide significant blood pressure reduction in ol
der hypertensives with Stage I-III diastolic hypertension. Both drugs
are well tolerated with no significant adverse effect on renal or card
iovascular function after short term therapy.