C. Francoisgerard et al., MULTICENTER EUROPEAN EVALUATION OF HIV TESTING ON SERUM AND SALIVA SAMPLES, Transfusion clinique et biologique, 3(2), 1996, pp. 89-98
Objective: to evaluate the reliability of HIV antibody testing on sali
va. Design: matched serum and saliva samples were collected from both
seronegative (n = 344) and seropositive (n = 125) individuals in five
European countries. Duplicate saliva samples collected with Omni-Sal d
evices provided by Saliva Diagnostic System (SDS) were pooled before a
nalysis. Methods: all samples were analyzed by Recombinant HIV1 EIA Ca
mbridge Bioscience and 2nd generation Abbott HIV 1&2 1A80. EIA procedu
res were adapted for saliva testing by modification of sample dilution
and/or cut-off calculation. All saliva recording positive and/or doub
tful EIA results were further analyzed by Western blot as a confirmato
ry method. Results: EIA results obtained from sera analysis from both
seropositives and seronegatives allowed for calculation of the tests'
sensitivity (HIV1 Biotech: 99.2% - 100%; Abbott: 100%) and specificity
(both tests 100%). In the series of 125 saliva samples collected from
seropositives, the EIA results were as follows: with Biotech (3 negat
ive, 3 in the grey-zone and 119 reactive) and with Abbott (1 negative,
1 in the grey-zone and 123 reactive). One saliva sample found negativ
e by both EIA tests, although fulfilling HIV1 WE criteria of positivit
y, was collected from an HIV2 infected person. Out of 125 saliva sampl
es collected from seropositives, 121 produced positive Western Blot pr
ofiles, 4 were indeterminate and 1 was found negative whereas 125/125
sera were found positive. Conclusion: the reliability of HIV testing o
f saliva is dependent on the sensitivity of EIA tests and on the crite
ria used for the interpretation of Western blot tests as well. Althoug
h saliva testing offers numerous advantages for epidemiological purpos
es, it should not be recommended for diagnosis.