DISINFLATION AND THE RECESSION-NOW-VERSUS-RECESSION-LATER HYPOTHESIS - EVIDENCE FROM URUGUAY

Citation
Aw. Hoffmaister et Ca. Vegh, DISINFLATION AND THE RECESSION-NOW-VERSUS-RECESSION-LATER HYPOTHESIS - EVIDENCE FROM URUGUAY, Staff papers - International Monetary Fund, 43(2), 1996, pp. 355-394
Citations number
62
Categorie Soggetti
Economics,"Business Finance
ISSN journal
00208027
Volume
43
Issue
2
Year of publication
1996
Pages
355 - 394
Database
ISI
SICI code
0020-8027(1996)43:2<355:DATRH->2.0.ZU;2-N
Abstract
Both analytical models and casual empiricism suggest that the timing o f the recessionary costs associated with inflation stabilization in ch ronic inflation countries may depend on the nominal anchor that is use d. Under money-based stabilization, the recession occurs at the beginn ing of the program, while under exchange-rate-based stabilization the recession occurs later in the program. This paper provides a first att empt to formally rest this hypothesis using a vector-autoregression mo del for Uruguay. The impulse response of output to different stabiliza tion policies is broadly consistent with the ''recession-now-versus-re cession-later'' hypothesis.