D. Pinquier et al., BENEFITS OF THE LOW-PRESSURE MULTICHANNEL ENDOTRACHEAL VENTILATION, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 154(1), 1996, pp. 82-90
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Emergency Medicine & Critical Care","Respiratory System
Mechanical ventilation using a modified endotracheal tube, allowing by
pass and washout of the endotracheal dead space (McETV), was compared
with conventional controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) in healthy a
nd in surfactant-depleted rabbits. In healthy animals, shifting from C
MV to McETV led to an increase in Pa-O2 (89 +/- 16 versus 104 +/- 13 m
m Hg; p < 0.05) and a decrease in Pa-CO2 (41.5 +/- 3 versus 30 +/- 3 m
m Hg; p < 0.05). As a result of reducing the peak inspiratory pressure
(PIP) from 21 +/- 2 to 12 +/- 2 cm H2O (p < 0.05), it was possible in
McETV mode to maintain comparable ventilation to that achieved by CMV
. In surfactant-depleted animals, compared with CMV, McETV produced a
rise in Pa-O2 without change in thoracic volume (from 100 +/- 40 to 15
0 +/- 60 mm Hg, p < 0.05) and a fall in Pa-CO2 (from 46 +/- 5 to 37 +/
- 4 mm Hg, p < 0.05). After 4 h of ventilation, the surfactant-deplete
d animals from the CMV group developed thoracic overdistension quicker
(at hour 1, p < 0.05) and, consequently, more animals died from pneum
othorax compared with the McETV group (five versus two). We concluded
that McETV ensured adequate gas exchanges with lower insufflation pres
sures and could diminish positive pressure ventilation-induced injury.